£100k salaries attacked
Officials have defended the salary of a Lincolnshire council boss who earns almost as much as the Prime Minister.
Tony McArdle, chief executive of Lincolnshire County Council, was paid around £172,500 in 2008-09.
The salary – one of the highest in local government – is just £22,000 less than that earned by Gordon Brown in the same year.
New data also shows that several other council chiefs in the county are on salaries in excess of £100,000.
The TaxPayers' Alliance, which compiled the figures, has attacked the bumper pay packets.
Policy analyst John O'Connell said: "Town hall bosses have had a very good recession at taxpayers' expense.
"More of them than ever are earning massive amounts, and they even enjoyed a healthy pay rise while everyone else was suffering pay freezes, cuts or redundancies."
But council officials have rushed to defend the salaries – saying they would be far higher in the private sector.
Bosses at the county council say Mr McArdle is running one of the biggest local authorities in the country – and his salary has been frozen for the past two years.
For more on the figures, see Friday's Echo.











24 Comments
View all
by lynn, lincoln
Monday, April 05 2010, 6:20PM
“Sorry - I meant to say council. Got carried away and in front of myself.”
by lynn, lincoln
Monday, April 05 2010, 6:18PM
“ex councillor worker, my house - very very cute indeed!”
by ex council worker, my house
Monday, April 05 2010, 5:56AM
“A company discovered they were losing 235k worth of stock so they employ a night watchman on 15k a year. Obviously the night watchman needs a supervisor, so one is hired at 30k a year. The supervisor needs a manager to make sure he is looking after the watchman, so one is hired at 45k a year. As there are now 3 workers a human resources manager has to be hired at 60k a year, to make sure that the manager is managing the supervisor. Then a CEO is hired to make sure the HR manager is doing his job properly at 100k a year. However it is then realised that its now costing 250k to save 235k so the night watchman is fired!!!
Sound familiar??”
by Mervyn Hobden, Birchwood, Lincoln
Sunday, April 04 2010, 3:34PM
“Steve,
Having worked in the private sector, in manufacturing, for the last 44 years, I cannot agree with your facile analysis. In both the public and the private sectors there has been a remorseless rise in overheads and a decline in productivity, coupled to an exponential increase in remuneration at the top, with no measurable improvement in outcome. From your figures on turnover and staff levels, I calculate that you have £200k turnover per employee. This means that business is either in the retail sector, with very high gross margins, or a law firm!
You might care to consider how that gross margin is generated - either by low prices paid to your suppliers, or excessive prices paid by your customers. The private sector is full of companies pushing junk products at vastly inflated prices, now I cannot call that efficient! Neither is it capitalism, except in terms of the perverted form exported from America, for which we have all just been presented the bill for £8000 per head. I see little or no difference between management in the public and private business sectors - both have behaved in a monumentaly greedy and selfish way since the 1980s, with a complete disregard for the fortunes of their employees. And as for transparency and shareholder power in the private sector - have you ever been to a shareholders meeting and seen the total disregard of the directors with respect to critisism from the floor? I have in the case of the lamented Marconi company, where the board had turned a £4.5bn cash mountain into £6.5bn of debt!
Before the private sector criticises the public sector performance too closely, it needs to deal with the stench from its own Aegean stables - now that is a Herculean task!”
by Robin Renshaw, Lincoln
Sunday, April 04 2010, 3:19PM
“""my company has a turn over of £12bn and employs over 60k staff. "
Clearly not too busy if has time to rubbish comments from a concerned former elected member who gave up his free time for 10 years and an employee for 33 years.
Methinks its is the non-domiciled Lord A pouring millions into Cameron's coffers to help his takeover bid from Belize to run UK ltd.”