Saturday, March 16 2013, 10:25PM
“When my daughter took over her council house she was left with little option but to take a 3 bedroom property when a 2 bedroom property would have done.Had she not taken the 3 bed she would have to go to the back of the queue. As it was the place was a wreck with graffiti over every wall and ceiling in every room. Now they want to penalise her for having an extra room. She would move to a 2 bed but will pay for the extra room as her son is in a fantastic school and doesn't want to move him. So this extra room tax is not as cut and dry as some people think.”
Sunday, March 17 2013, 7:26AM
“One possible way to change the Government's mind may be by signing the e-petition.
http://tinyurl.com/ckbukrf
http://tinyurl.com/chwlcp6
http://tinyurl.com/cj9zgl8”
Sunday, March 17 2013, 7:33AM
“One way everyone could help is by signing the online e-petitions,it may help to change the government's mind on this unfair tax.
http://tinyurl.com/cj9zgl8
http://tinyurl.com/ckbukrf
http://tinyurl.com/chwlcp6”
Sunday, March 17 2013, 7:55AM
“This pathetic idea is going to ruin I don't know how many lives by making some people homeless, and many costing the Country more by being put in the private sector. Not to mention all the extra cost of sorting it all out. Is there anyone in this Government with a braincell that works well enough for them to think of the implications to start with?”
Sunday, March 17 2013, 7:19PM
“I did not agree with Maggie selling council houses but Labour took advantage of it also. In some ways I agree with making people pay for empty bedrooms as these are subsidised by the taxpayer and there are people waiting for bigger houses which are being under ocupied. The councils and goverment should get building one bedroom terrace houses to move these people into, also one bedroom bungalows for pensioners who can't manage steps, they have put the cart before the horse. Anyone who makes an application now to apply for a smaller house should not have to pay for the spare rooms until they are offered a smaller house, but if they refuse the replacement house they should then have to pay for the extra rooms. I bought my own property, first one falling down and renovated it, I now have a small bungalow as I could not manage the stairs but I wish I was in a subsidised bungalow, people do not realise how much more they get with repairs and updates to the property which many low paid and old people in their own properties can't afford to do so learn to be thankfull for the subsidised house you have.
I agree that this rule should apply to MP's also, maybe build a large block of flats maybe with 2 bedrooms so one could be a study, why should they be different, but I guess they always will be as no party would vote for this idea.”
Sunday, March 17 2013, 9:50PM
“IT_MAN - - - What happens if you had been in a situation like camelherder's daughter, and didn't have any other option? Say you had lived there a long time and kept the property clean and tidy. If you were then offered somewhere extremely dirty many miles from all your friends and neighbours with no transport to your poorly paid job (that is why you get social housing benefit), and would have to leave it because you couldn't afford a car or taxi would you still suggest leaving as the best policy. As I suggested on another page people should be given the chance (if somewhere became available), but the extra to pay should only come in for new tenants as otherwise how many lives will it totally destroy.”
“Specialist Housing Committees have been consulted over the legal implications of re-classifying thousands of properties to maximise savings in the unpopular, soon to be implemented, bedroom tax.
Given the go-ahead, it's estimated 1 in 3 occupants in social housing – thought safe from the sanctions – upon re-evaluation will be deemed to have extra living space and forced either to find smaller properties or survive on lesser housing benefit.
Under new rules, a single bedroom having more than 180 sq ft floor space will be redefined as two rooms. The Government are calling to amend the 1985 Housing Act which will make these changes enforceable. The cost of dividing up living space should these measures be introduced will fall on the claimant, with the tenant facing eviction or heavy fines if failing to carry out work within strict time limits.”