Wednesday, April 11 2012, 2:21PM
“We need to dispense with the total misnomer 'light pollution'.
Agreed, wasted light would be a better description. Better designed lights that reflected more light downwards rather than allowing it to 'leak' upwards would lead to better lit streets or a reduction in the energy required to provide the current level of lighting.”
Wednesday, April 11 2012, 4:53PM
“It's not a misnomer, look at the definition of pollute.
You also don't have to chose between seeing where you're going and seeing the stars - the problem is most street lighting for example is not fit for purpose. We pay a lot of money to make that orange glow and it doesn't help anybody do anything.”
Thursday, April 12 2012, 6:40AM
“pol·lute
2. To make less suitable for an activity, especially by the introduction of unwanted factors: The stadium lights polluted the sky around the observatory.
http://tinyurl.com/clb383x”
Thursday, April 12 2012, 9:41AM
“Oh joy, a game of link wars with the resident pedant.
http://tinyurl.com/bnhmmgb
http://tinyurl.com/cvmqbnt”
“The UK's night skies are still "saturated" with light pollution despite action to reduce it in some areas, campaigners warned today. The latest annual star count survey by the Campaign to Protect Rural England and the Campaign for Dark Skies showed that more than half the population could only see 10 stars or fewer within the major constellation of Orion. Trials to switch off or dim street lights at certain times of day have often proved controversial with residents - usually for safety reasons - so what can be done to effectively reduce light pollution?”